Gordon austin dentist

In the video, which you can see below, a former patient of the dentist, identified as Laura Crowder, described the horror she endured at Gordon's practice. On March 1, , a YouTube user, identified as " gordonaustinisacoward ," posted the video of WAGA's report, as well as a transcript of portions of the report.

As of this writing, the video has had only 5, or so views. Regardless, somehow the video came to the Georgia dentist's attention, and now he's suing the anonymous user, identified in court documents as "John Doe," claiming the video is "inflammatory" and "interferes with [Gordon's] business.

John Doe's attorney, Paul Levy, has moved to have the suit dismissed for several reasons. First, he says, the dentist has not shown any evidence that he was defamed by the video. Second, he says, the statute of limitations has expired. Levy also brings up another interesting take on the case: why the dentist is suddenly so interested in a seven-year-old video. For John Doe's attorney, Paul Levy, the dentist's actions amount to little more than bullying. Nearby Dentists.

Add a Review Consumer Feedback 4. Was it easy to find parking at this provider's office? Did this provider rush your appointment? Does this provider ever overbook appointments here? No, They definitely believe in quality over quantity and allow more than enough time in between appointments.

Did your gums bleed excessively after your appointment? Not at all! They were very gentle and careful. Was this provider's office easy to locate? It couldn't have been easier! They made sure every single question I had was answered, and are always available if I think of any more questions I want answered. Their staff is the most friendly, welcoming staff I've ever dealt w ith. They are so warm and professional, and make the whole experience that much better.

Austin subpoenaed Google to try to unmask Doe — they say they were surprised that anyone was trying to make a defamation claim over a video that was posted six years earlier. The lawsuit was brought in Aug. But even though Doe was firm in the belief that Dr. Austin had no legal leg to stand on regarding his defamation claim, they still need a lawyer willing to take up their case. All these years later, Doe could have just taken the clip down or had their identity revealed to Dr.

The battle over this relatively ancient YouTube video almost came to an abrupt end yesterday. Around the same time that our story was posted on Jan. This is how the video looked on the morning of Jan. We also sent multiple requests for comment to Dr. However, Doe was able to successfully appeal this decision and the video was up again hours after it was removed. Want more consumer news? Visit our parent organization, Consumer Reports , for the latest on scams, recalls, and other consumer issues.